Jump to content

Talk:Mattel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Splitting proposal for the Mattel Television section

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


In case no one knows this: Mattel Creations become Mattel Television on February 5th, 2019. At the time of Creations, a confused user/contributor proposed a splitting off into a new article of its own, but I gotta say, Spshu was bang on with the narrow referencing call as I want to call it at that/the time. Maybe, in terms of announcing new productions and releasing than actual movements within that division. Three years later, with the division name change, I have to argue very well, the referencing has "gone bonkers", especially after the "Barbie Princess Adventure" TV movie release on Netflix on September 1st, 2020. In light of this, I propose that section Mattel Television in this article be split into a separate article of its own. Its contents on this article have sufficient references to warrant a standalone article. What's your verdict: BBFanToys, Cannolis, GarfieldFTW and Spshu? Fooliard (talk) 16:12, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. A 'Mattel Television' standalone page is very much needed at this point in time, especially given the volume of references that have come to light in the last 3 years, as you've mentioned. Thank you for spearheading this project. BBFanToys (talk) 16:52, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. The article stands to run WP:TOOLONG if anything more is added to the Mattel Television section, and right now it reads like two articles mashed together anyway. ItsMackie (talk) 17:45, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Already done – and there's more to come!! The consensus may be done but WP, Mattel and the likes roll on!! Thanks for the movements and thoughts!! Intrisit (talk) 23:18, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Semi-protected edit request on 19 May 2022

[edit]
2601:603:4D00:5B10:6407:7E2E:7323:6B73 (talk) 04:38, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey in uno you got it wrong you are allowed to double +2 so change the rules

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. —Sirdog (talk) 07:08, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 May 2022

[edit]
2601:603:4D00:5B10:BDC1:4D20:6487:7342 (talk) 02:08, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey in uno you got it wrong you are allowed to double +2 so change the rules

 Not done: this is the talk page for discussing improvements to the page Mattel. Please make your request at the talk page for the article concerned. 💜  melecie  talk - 02:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Citations 11 and 12 are out of date and do not support conclusion in artilce

[edit]

The line "It (Mattel) is the world's second largest toy maker in terms of revenue, after The Lego Group.[11][12]" is no longer accurate based on audited financial records filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Suggest updating the sentence to not contain a present tense statement of fact.

Form 10-K for Hasbro INC filed 02/22/2023

0001628280-23-004416 (d18rn0p25nwr6d.cloudfront.net) 174.141.207.132 (talk) 19:44, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: NAS 348 Global Climate Change

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2024 and 29 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): CalmSunny (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Mshea22.

— Assignment last updated by TotalSolarEclipse (talk) 17:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Criticisms and Controversies of Mattel

[edit]

Mattel faced a lot of controversies. There should be a section on that. Abhiramakella (talk) 18:51, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]